A Plea for the Preservation of Choice

An open letter to event organizers, business owners, and community leaders

Our collective hearts are hurting. Now more than ever, communities are leaning on your leadership to provide places of safety. We are all exhausted by living in “unprecedented times”, and we are all yearning for a sense of normalcy, stability, and a return to activities that bring joy both personally and interpersonally. You likely feel a strong sense of responsibility to create policies that foster collective safety, both physically and emotionally.

Perhaps the most significant policy consideration these days involves blanket mandates of covid “vaccines”. There is extremely strong social and governmental pressure to require these mandates. However, I urge you to consider some of the hidden ramifications of adopting such a policy, as it is a much more complex issue than media soundbytes would lead us to believe.

While requiring these shots for attendance at your event, workplace, or other gathering may seem like the best way to assuage fear and mitigate risk for your community, people are increasingly recognizing that vaccine mandates are discriminatory, unnecessary, unsafe, and a gross violation of informed consent.

Federal law has established anti-discrimination policies, including the discrimination against individuals with medical disability. No medical procedure is appropriate across the board for all individuals. As outlined below, there exist major concerns. Mask mandates paved the way for vaccine mandates. While requiring masks may have seemed innocuous to people for whom it presented no problem, there are many people who are unable to wear a mask for legitimate medical reasons. Consider how many more people may be unable to submit to covid injections. Do you know all possible reactions and contraindications for the ingredients listed alone? Further, vaccine mandates violate the Nuremberg Code, designed to ensure informed consent for any medical procedure upon humans.

There is insufficient evidence to support the necessity, safety, or efficacy of these shots.

Necessity

Increasing reports demonstrate robust immunity following recovery from COVID-19. CDC numbers show survival rates of 98.23% for adults and even higher for children at 99.985%. Recently we are seeing reports from the CDC revealing that the data has been confounded as COVID-19 diagnoses were combined with flu and pneumonia to present inflated numbers both in terms of cases and deaths. These numbers are hardly sufficient to justify the mandate of any medical intervention - let alone one still in experimental stages.

Safety

These aren’t “vaccines” in the traditional sense of the term. Rather, they are an experimental gene therapy designed to alter your genetic expression. Safety studies will not be completed until 2023 at the earliest. It is literally impossible to make conclusions about the safety of something that has been neither studied nor in use for an extended period of time.

This is a risky medical procedure. We are already seeing alarmingly high rates of adverse events ranging from cardiac problems (especially in young people) to fertility compromise and pregnancy loss to death. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system is a voluntary reporting system established in 1990 after legislation passed to remove all liability for vaccine manufacturers. A Harvard Pilgrim study found that less than 1% of side-effects that physicians should report following vaccination are actually reported to VAERS. As of July 30, 2021, there have been:

• 12,366 covid vaccine related deaths (for perspective, since VAERS was established in 1990, in total there have been 21,224 vaccine deaths reported)
• 46,036 total covid vaccine related hospitalizations (123,608 total VAERS hospitalizations)
• 545,337 covid vaccine adverse events reports (1,357,036 total VAERS reports since 1990)

Reports include:

• 4,759 anaphylaxis
• 4,044 bell’s palsy
• 1,381 miscarriages
• 5,236 heart attacks
• 3,728 myocarditis / pericarditis
• 14,251 permanently disabled
• 2,269 thrombocytopenia / low platelet count
• 12,194 life-threatening
• 23,354 severe allergic reactions
• 7,509 shingles

While these reports are made by healthcare professionals and self-reporting individuals, this data indicates a concerning trend that should be investigated and not ignored. Especially in light of the unconscionable degree of underreporting of adverse vaccine injuries.

Many of the ingredients listed on the inserts for these shots are known to cause neurological and brain damage, cancer, infertility, heart inflammation, and a litany of other serious problems. This information, while suppressed in mainstream media, is easily identifiable through the material safety data sheets for each chemical. It is not up for debate as some “quack theory”. This should not be taken lightly. There has also been much discussion amongst the scientific community regarding the potential relationship between covid shots and a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and autoimmune diseases.

Efficacy

These shots do not prevent transmission. According to the manufacturers, they are meant to reduce severity of illness if the person themselves gets sick. Anyone who has performed lab research, studied statistics, or is familiar with research methodology knows that the presented conclusions of any study are heavily influenced by the original question(s) asked, the study design, sample size, methods, and who funded the study (interest bias)...as well as the fact that data can be manipulated to support pretty much anything. While news outlets and government officials are parroting pharmaceutical company claims of relative risk reduction, there is an important distinction between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction. The numbers with which most lay people are familiar, are the former - which sound much more impressive. But peer-reviewed literature published in the highly-regarded medical journal Lancet shows that the experimental injections reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:

• Pfizer: 0.8%
• J&J: 1.2%
• Moderna: 1.2%
• AstraZeneca: 1.3%

So, basically, no significant prevention. We are seeing increasing reports that the majority of hospitalized covid cases are vaccinated individuals.

In light of these major evidentiary failures, policies mandating this experimental medical intervention appear to be more about social control and compliance than reality. Understandably, people cling to the idea of them because they are scared; afraid of the unknown - especially about how our immune systems work to protect us from microbial infection. We’ve had a terrifying and traumatic collective experience, and anything that gives a tangible (yet unfounded) sense of control, safety, and security will feel appealing.

But if these policies had anything to do with actual health, it would make more sense to mandate something like vitamin D supplementation (as that has shown to dramatically enhance adaptive cellular immunity while mitigating pulmonary hyper-inflammation and averting the cytokine storm associated with severe and prolonged illness). Then again, like the “vaccine”, vitamin D does nothing to prevent transmission, which is the most commonly cited reason behind considering mandatory vaccine policies.

If we are truly concerned with transmission, consider this: exposure appears to be inevitable - especially at events where people are in prolonged close contact (such as social dancing, shared workspaces, etc). Those deeply concerned for their health (for example, immune-compromised individuals) may be better off staying home rather than relying on demanding coercive measures for everyone else.

Censorship

Not only is there insufficient evidence for necessity, safety, and efficacy, but we are seeing the outright censorship of an increasing litany of highly educated doctors and scientists raising concerns - to the point where singular messaging dominates the major news and social media platforms, and literally any other perspectives are silenced, attacked, and labelled as “crazy conspiracy theories”.

The favorite technique to discount any dissenting perspectives is to tear apart the person’s credentials or point out imperfections / incomplete understanding as a way to disqualify and ignore the entirety of their viewpoints. Nearly all media platforms are funded by advertisements, mostly pharmaceutical. 

Absurdly, we are acting as if the default behavior should be a MEDICAL INTERVENTION rather than placing the burden of proof on convincing people that the intervention should be undertaken. 

I will also take a brief moment to point out this quote by Aldous Huxley: “The propagandist’s purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human.”

It is worth considering that it has become increasingly socially acceptable to turn on one another on the basis of how we are each handling the incredibly traumatic events of the last 18 months. Many times throughout history, those in power have manipulated masses of people into a sense of justified segregation and mistreatment of “others” by convincing them that the “other” group is “dirty, diseased, unsafe”. The messaging we are seeing today about “anti-maskers” and “anti-vaxxers” is dehumanizing and completely neglects the intricacies of human experience. 

Many of the people who have concerns with blind compliance with these medical interventions have serious medical conditions that contraindicate the use of masks and/or these experimental injections.

The BIGGEST concern many of us have is philosophical, centering around the concepts of consent and bodily sovereignty.

Vaccine mandates violate the fundamental human right of informed consent for medical interventions. It flies in the face of logic to see so many people and organizations who have long fought for the right to choose are now celebrating coercive measures. Coerced consent is NOT informed consent.

What to do with one’s body is a deeply personal choice. I honor everyone’s decision, ideally made with full information and professional support, whether that be to participate in this experimental vaccine study or not. This is not meant to be a condemnation of either perspective for their choices, but rather a plea for the preservation of choice. A celebration and honoring of bio-individuality and sovereignty. 

We are, as a society, at a major ethical crossroads. It’s a slippery slope supporting coerced and/or forced medical procedures in order to participate in society. Perhaps this one doesn’t bother you personally, but it paves the way for other medical interventions to be forced on you in the future. 

I am reminded of the poem many of us were taught as children in the context of the Holocaust:

First they came for the Socialists,
and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists,
and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left
to speak for me.

-Martin Niemöller

This is about so much more than a single policy for a single event or business. When you play it forward, what do you see? Vaccine boosters every few months and masks for the rest of time? Because I guarantee you that there will always be infectious pathogens. There will always be new variants (which are evolving faster than ever, arguably because of our lab-manipulation and overzealous chemical assault creating superbugs). What kind of future do you want to participate in creating?

If you as a leader want to support your community’s health, then perhaps it makes more sense to encourage behaviors that support immune competence. Evidence continues to show that immune competence is the greatest predictor of health outcomes. Personally, I would feel MUCH more supported by resources for improving my own immune competence rather than discriminatory policies attempting to coerce me into an experimental medical intervention with the threat of being otherwise excluded. There is, in fact, a LOT that we can do to influence our health outcomes - both in terms of covid-19 and with respect to all immunological challenges. 

For organizations and leaders who are deeply committed to sovereignty, consent, consciousness, healing arts and wellbeing, and encouraging our natural ability to experience the richness of each moment of life, perhaps a more congruent path would be to lead the way in offering support around immune competence. 

I recognize that we are all doing our best, you included, to navigate this wild time. I also recognize that I may have shared things here that are new for some of you, and certainly fly in the face of mainstream opinions about what is happening in our world. I hope that you will consider your policy decisions carefully, including the precedent set and ramifications for our community moving forward.

All my love,
Dr Satya

 

Satya Sardonicus, DC, CACCP
Champion of Human Potential
Creator | Fascial Flow Method™

insta @resilience.artist